Journal Articles

Evaluating Journal Quality : Is the H-Index a Better Measure Than Impact Factors?

---

Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure—the h-index—that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession’s applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Research on Social Work Practice

Call Number

-

Publisher

Thousand Oak : sage publisher., 2011

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

10497315

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 21 no. 2, March 2011 .pp. 222-230

Subject(s)

Bibliometrics
Evaluating journal quality
Impact factors
Journal quality

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment