Journal Articles

What Types of Designs are We Using in Social Work Research and Evaluation?

---

This article addresses a void in the literature about social work research and evaluation (R&E) designs, in particular related to the quality of its published work. Data were collected by reviewing three empirically oriented journals, Research on Social Work Practice, Journal of Social Service Research, and Social Work Research over three publication years 2005, 2006, and 2007. A total of N = 329 articles were content analyzed accordingly: research versus nonresearch, designs used, design objectives, sample sizes, primary statistics used, and outcomes. Main findings were (a) social work’s R&E is uniquely characterized by a cohort of nonresearch studies, which assist in understanding our empirically published work; (b) the most frequently used designs were preexperimental (82.2%) and least frequently used were experimental (2.3%); (c) design objectives were equally dispersed across exploration, variable relationships, instrument development, and program/evaluation; (d) primary statistics used were parametric (82.2%); and (e) 96.7% of the studies specified outcomes within them. Implications are directed to better understanding the context of where social work R&E is conducted, not apologizing for the designs the author uses, and how one can and should strengthen our study designs to offset their concerns.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Research on Social Work Practice

Call Number

-

Publisher

: sage publisher., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

10497315

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 20 no. 6, November 2010.pp. 665-673

Subject(s)

Quality
Designs
Research and evaluation

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment