Journal Articles

Speaking for the Institution: A Fourth Production Site for Group Members’ Influence Attempts

---

Analysis of the transcript of a jury’s deliberations reveals a fourth production site for influence attempts beyond the three identified by Meyers and Brashers. The fourth site involves influence attempts by jurors to uphold the interests of a particular Court and a particular proceeding, and perhaps the interests of the larger judicial system. This gives the Institution a place at the table as an agent of influence, something that arguably generalizes beyond juries to all task groups embedded within organizations. The main part of the analysis identifies three main functions that were served by making the Institution’s presence at the table felt—directives, correctives of others’ positions and arguments, and justifications of positions and arguments. In addition, the analysis identifies two main ways that participants marked shifts in footing from speaking in their own voice to speaking in the Institution’s voice. The first is the use of direct quotations of the Court’s instructions. The second is the use of modal auxiliaries such as “should” and “need to,” that presuppose an external source of rules and obligations.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Small Group Research

Call Number

-

Publisher

: sage publisher., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

10464964

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 41 no. 4, August 2010.pp. 427-451

Subject(s)

Influence
Group deliberation
Production site
Footing

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment