Journal Articles

Mobilizing Restraint: Economic Reform and the Politics of Industrial Protest in South Asia

---

The study draws on evidence from South Asia to explore how union partisan ties condition industrial protest in the context of rapid economic change. It argues that unions controlled by major political parties respond to the economic challenges of the postreform period by facilitating institutionalized grievance resolution and encouraging restraint in the collective bargaining arena. By contrast, politically independent unions and those controlled by small parties are more likely to ratchet up militancy and engage in extreme or violent forms of protest. The difference between the protest behavior of major party unions and other types of unions is explained by the fact that major political parties are encompassing organizations that internalize the externalities associated with the protest of their affiliated unions. Using original survey data from four regions in South Asia, the study shows that party encompassment is a better predictor of worker protest than other features of the affiliated party or the union, including whether the party is in or out of power, the ideological orientation of the party, or the degree of union encompassment. The analysis has implications for the policy debate over whether successful economic reform is contingent upon the political exclusion or repression of organized labor.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

WORLD POLITICS

Call Number

-

Publisher

Cambridge : Cambridge University Press., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

00438871

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 62, No. 4 October 2010.pp. 676-713

Subject(s)

economic reform
South Asia
Politics of Industrial Protest

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment