Journal Articles

Experts’ Political Preferences and Their Impact on Ideological Bias: An Unfolding Analysis based on a Benoit-Laver Expert Survey

---

Expert surveys have become increasingly popular among political scientists. One of the problems of using surveys (of any sort) to estimate party positions is that respondents can be influenced by their subjective political views. As a consequence, experts may give biased responses, and such (ideological) bias may affect certain parties more than others. In this paper, we use the latest expert survey of Benoit and Laver (2006) to unfold the ideal points of the respondents to the survey. By employing the estimated ideal points, we show that in almost 16 percent of the cases analyzed, there is evidence of an ideological bias in the experts’ placements of parties along the left—right dimension, especially among right-wing parties (but not necessarily extreme-right parties). We examine two methods designed to generate less biased estimates. The first one is directly based on a regression technique, while the second is based on the negligibility of ideological bias in experts’ answers to more specific policy questions. The paper concludes by examining the consequences of these findings for empirical research.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Party Politics

Call Number

-

Publisher

: sage publisher., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

13540688

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 16 no. 3, May 2010. pp. 299-321

Subject(s)

Italy
Expert survey
Ideologi bias
Left-right dimension
Unfolding analysis
EXPERTS POLITICAL PREFERENCES

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment