Journal Articles

"Such Inferior Courts . . .": Compliance by Circuits with Jurisprudential Regimes

---

Through its rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court makes clear what the Constitution means and how best to interpret congressional statutes. But, because Supreme Court rulings do not implement themselves, the Court is dependent on compliance by lower courts to effectuate its policies. Using the concept of jurisprudential regimes developed by Richards and Kritzer in 2002 and specifically the Establishment Clause jurisprudential regime they identified in 2003, we evaluate the extent to which the U.S. Courts of Appeals faithfully implement the Supreme Court's policy in this area of law. We find that decision making by court of appeals panels is indeed structured by the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudential regime, even when taking into account the policy preferences of court of appeals judges. Furthermore we find that this attentiveness to legal factors is not a function of circuit court judges' fear of reversal.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

American Politics Research

Call Number

-

Publisher

Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publication., 2009

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

1532-673x

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 37, No. 1, January 2009.pp. 75-106

Subject(s)

U.S. courts of appeals
Judicial compliance
Judicial decision making
Jurisprudential regimes
Establishment Clause

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment