Journal Articles

Defending the status quo across venues and coalitions: evidence from California interest groups

---

This study investigates the conditions under which pro-status quo groups increase their advocacy success during an entire policymaking process. It scrutinises whether pro-status quo defenders who are involved in multiple institutional venues and who join many coalitions of interest groups are able to achieve their policy preferences. A case study focussing on the regulation of stem cell research in California traces the policymaking process and the related advocacy activities of interest groups in legislative, administrative, judicial and direct democratic venues. The empirical results, which are based on a formal social network analysis, reveal that very few groups are multivenue players and members of several coalitions. In addition, occupying a central network position is insufficient for the pro-status quo groups to improve their advocacy success.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Journal of Public Policy

Call Number

-

Publisher

New York : Cambridge University Press., 2017

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

0141814X

Classification

NONE

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Volume 37, Issue 1, March 2017, p. 1-26

Subject(s)

Advocacy
interest groups
Social network analysis

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment