Journal Articles
Strategic party heterogeneity
Political parties field heterogeneous candidates and send a variety of messages about their policy
positions. Yet most voting models maintain that office-seeking parties should enforce intraparty
homogeneity and cultivate clear party reputations. This article reconciles theory with reality by
identifying a strategic rationale for parties to pursue heterogeneity. I develop a model in which
two parties each select a distribution of potential candidates to compete in an upcoming election.
The model demonstrates that well-positioned parties should indeed offer homogeneous candidate
teams, but that parties with platforms distant from the median voter should cast a wide net.
Extensions allow for multiple candidate signals, voters who care about party platforms and candidates’ positions, and voter uncertainty.
No copy data
No other version available