Journal Articles
Work Enforcement in Liberal Democracies
The paper aims to contribute to the normative debate concerning work enforcement in
liberal democracies. In the late 1980s, OECD countries began to revert to the pre-welfare-
state tradition of attributing unemployment to personal failure. The new welfare-to-work
policies emphasised individual responsibility for securing employment. Stepping up job
search requirements and sanctions for failure to meet them was presented as a public
intervention that helps unemployed individuals return from dependency to autonomy.
Jobseekers have been made to believe that success in obtaining employment depends on
how doggedly they search for work and how adaptable they become to employer needs.
These presumptions are challenged in the paper. Contracts that jobseekers are forced to
sign with providers of employment services curtail their autonomy not only to the extent
that they cannot avoid unproductive activity tests imposed on them, but also from a
lifetime perspective in cases where they are forced into inferior jobs. In job-short
economies, employers are also certain to discriminate against disadvantaged jobseekers
notwithstanding the intensity of their effort or openness to occupational change.
No copy data
No other version available