Journal Articles

What Doesn’t Work? Three Failures, Many Answers

---

Current debates on impact evaluation have addressed the question ‘what works and what doesn’t?’ mainly focussing on methodology failures when providing evidence of impact. In order to answer that question, this article contrasts different approaches to evaluation in terms of the way they address different kinds of possible failures. First, there is more to be debated than simply methodological failures: there are also programme theory failures and implementations failures. Moreover, not all methodological failures are a simple matter of selection bias. Second, the article reviews issues that have recently been raised within different approaches relative to each failure. For programme theory failure, it is a matter of complexity and providing rival explanations; for implementation failure: how to use guidelines, and how to take context into account; and for methodology failure: how to move from internal to external validity, and to syntheses, within the framework of ‘situational responsiveness’. All these issues disclose a terrain for potential exchange between the protagonists of different approaches to impact evaluation.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Evaluation

Call Number

-

Publisher

: sage publisher., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

13563890

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 16 no. 4, October 2010.pp. 371-387

Subject(s)

External validity
Implementation failure
Methodology failure
Theory failure
What Doesnt Work

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment