Journal Articles

Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power. An international study of stakeholder perspectives

---

This paper analyses patterns in beliefs about the implementation of wind power as part of a geographical comparison of onshore wind power developments in the Netherlands, North-Rhine Westphalia and England. Q methodology is applied, in order to systematically compare the patterns in stakeholder views on the institutional conditions and changes in the domains of energy policy, spatial planning and environmental policy. Three factors represent support for wind power implementation from fundamentally different perspectives. The fourth perspective is critical opposed to wind power developments as well as critical to the manner in which wind projects are proposed, planned and implemented. These four perspectives exist across the geographical cases; however, some perspectives are prominent in one case and marginal in another. This relates to different legacies and varying implementation achievements in the three cases. The analysis shows that an approach that focuses on implementing as much wind power as possible, relying on technocratic reasoning and hierarchical policies is in practice the least successful, whereas collaborative perspectives with more emphasis on local issues and less on the interests of the conventional energy sector were particularly dominant in the most successful case, North-Rhine Westphalia.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Call Number

-

Publisher

United Kingdom : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

09640568

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Volume 53, Issue 5 July 2010 , pages 535 - 558

Subject(s)

Wind energy implementation
Core beliefs
Institutional capacity
Stakeholder perspectives

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment