Journal Articles

The Moderation Theory Revisited: The Case of Islamic Political Actors

---

An influential political science literature argues that integration of radical political parties within the political system leads to their moderation. These parties trade off their ideological platforms for electoral viability and political legality. Radicals become moderates through strategic interests. In this article, I revisit this thesis and apply it to the Islamic political actors in Iran and Turkey by employing the comparative method of agreement. Three conclusions are reached. First, moderation helps explain the evolution of Islamists into Muslim reformers. Second, moderation is a double-edged sword, especially in regimes with strong un-democratic characteristics. Moderation of radicals may result in their domestication — a situation that does not contribute to democratic transition or consolidation. Finally, change in the ideologies of political elites is central in our understanding behavioural change. The data sources include ethnography, primary language sources and historical narratives.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

Party Politics

Call Number

-

Publisher

Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publication., 2010

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

13540688

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 2010. pp. 69-88

Subject(s)

Democratization
moderation
Turkey
Iran
Islam
THE MODERATION THEORY REVISITED

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment