Journal Articles

Adopting Direct Democracy: Tests of Competing Explanations of Institutional Change

---

Why was direct democracy adopted in some U.S. states and not others? In this article, we sort through the various arguments advanced in the predominantly historical literature by using event history analysis. Among other factors we identify the importance of popular support for Populists and Socialists as well as the constraints imposed by state constitutions. We also find that the demographic composition of states was strongly associated with success or failure to adopt the initiative. Furthermore, we identify a number of key cases—highlighted by this approach—that present intriguing anomalies to the general patterns identified in the historical and political science literatures to date.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

American Politics Research

Call Number

-

Publisher

Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publication., 2009

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

1532-673x

Classification

-

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

Vol. 37, No. 6, November 2009.pp. 1024-1047

Subject(s)

Referendum
Direct democracy
U.S. state politics
Innovation adoption
Institutional reform
Initiative
Adopting Direct Democracy

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment