Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

Image of Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation

Journal Articles

Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation

Cousins, J. Bradley - Personal Name; Whitmore, Elizabeth - Personal Name; Shulha, Lyn - Personal Name;

In this article, we critique two recent theoretical developments about collaborative inquiry in evaluation—using logic models as a means to understand theory, and efforts to compartmentalize versions of collaborative inquiry into discrete genres—as a basis for considering future direction for the field. We argue that collaborative inquiry in evaluation is about relationships between trained evaluation specialists and nonevaluator stakeholders (i.e., members of the program community, intended program beneficiaries, or other persons with an interest in the program) and that practice should, in the first instance, be sensitive to stakeholder interests and context, and it should be principle-driven.

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title: American Journal of Evaluation
Call Number: -
Publisher: Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications., 2013
Collation: p. 7 - 22
Language: English
ISBN/ISSN: 1098-2140
Classification: -
Content Type: -
Media Type: -
Carrier Type: -
Edition: Volume 34, Nomor 1, March 2013 p. 7-22
Subject(s): program evaluation
Collaborative inquiry
complexity theory
principles of practice
Specific Detail Info: -
Statement of Responsibility: -

Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment

No Data

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment