Kemitraan Library

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Scientific Expertise and the Balance of Political Interests: MEDCAC and Medicare Coverage Decisions

Journal Articles

Scientific Expertise and the Balance of Political Interests: MEDCAC and Medicare Coverage Decisions

Lavertu, Stéphane - Personal Name; Weimer, David L. - Personal Name; Walters, Daniel E. - Personal Name;

Federal advisory committees are commonplace in the administrative state and often play a critical informational role in policymaking. Public administration scholars have yet to explore fully the implications of the institutional design and intra-committee dynamics that influence the advice produced by advisory committees. Using the Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee (MEDCAC) as a case, we provide a much needed empirical examination of committee composition, advice, and influence. MEDCAC provides advice to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) about what medical treatments to cover under Medicare. Using data from 2005 through 2009, this study compares the voting of different types of committee members and estimates the degree to which CMS coverage decisions correspond to these votes. The results indicate that patient and consumer representatives are generally more optimistic about medical treatments than regular committee members appointed for their expertise, but that these differences are mostly on technical matters. On matters that deal with Medicare benefits more explicitly, and thus come to bear more directly on coverage determinations, the differences in assessments between these representatives and regular committee members are minimal. The results also indicate that the votes of scientific experts correlate with CMS coverage decisions, and they suggest that the votes of guest experts are most influential when there is committee disagreement. Overall, the study yields evidence consistent with the notion that the advice of expert committee members captures the diverse preferences of political stakeholders and that it is influential in CMS's coverage decisions.


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
Call Number
p. 55-81
Publisher
Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press., 2012
Collation
-
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
1053-1858
Classification
-
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
Volume 22 Issue 1 January 2012 p. 55-81
Subject(s)
Public administration
Medical
Medicare
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
-
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
No Data
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Kemitraan Library
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

Established in 2003, the Library of Kemitraan was originally designed to record and collect all Kemitraan and grantees publications. However, today it broadly develops and serves more sectors to expand the collection to facilitate research activities, particularly since the inception of the Knowledge and Research Management within Kemitraan.

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search